Legal Opinion
Hugh Breeding Transport, Inc. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1936No. 25859PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff filed Its petition in this case on the 24th day of March, 1933, seeking to recover from the defendant certain expenses incurred by the plaintiff in the trial of a certain lawsuit in1 the district court o-f Tulsa county, Okla., entitled “L. A. Coward, Plaintiff, v. Hugh Breeding Transport, Inc., a Corporation,” bjejng No. 52868 in said court, and alleges that the expenses of said case in said court of Tulsa county were covered by a certain insurance policy it carried, covering one of the trucks of the plaintiff herein.
The parties appear in this case as they did in the lower…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. WrightsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Western States Oil & Land Co. v. HelmsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Walker v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Roach v. DearmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Industrial Indemnity Company v. Continental Casualty Company, Continental Casualty Company v. Industrial Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Maryland Casualty Company v. WillseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Western World Insurance v. Harford Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. HilderbrandtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.