Legal Opinion

Roach v. Dearman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1930No. 19249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, C.

The parties will be referred to herein as in the trial court.

On January 6, 1921, W. S. Bradshaw, being indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,000, together with his wife, Maggie Bradshaw, executed and -delivered to plaintiff their promissory note therefor, due in one year. On January 3, 1922, the note was renewed for one year. On January 6, 1923, the debt was again extended, and a new note given. Some time between January 6, 1923, and December, 1923, Bradshaw sold certain property to defendant, R. E. Roach, the consideration being $2,000. As a part of this transaction, Roach orally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Myers v. ChamnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. MinderhoutAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Dunnington v. Bank of CreweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Farmers Mer. Nat. Bk. of Cannon Falls v. DoffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. WrightsmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Hugh Breeding Transport, Inc. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API