Legal Opinion

Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1998No. S058779PublishedCited by 161 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*988Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

This case requires us to reconcile two apparently conflicting statutory schemes governing the recovery of costs and expert witness fees at the conclusion of a lawsuit. The general rule permits the prevailing party (plaintiffs and defendants) to recover certain costs and, under some circumstances, expert witness fees. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1032, subd. (b) [costs], 998, subd. (c) [expert witness fees].)1 More specifically, however, the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Civ. Code, § 1790 et seq. (hereafter sometimes the Song-Beverly Act or the Act)) contains a cost-shifting…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. ValladoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by161 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mexia v. Rinker Boat Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Robertson v. Fleetwood Travel Trailers of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API