People v. Hudson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1006Opinion
KENNARD, J.
A conviction of any of the offenses involving fleeing from a pursuing peace officer’s motor vehicle requires, among other things, that the officer’s vehicle be “distinctively marked.” (Veh. Code, §§ 2800.1, subd. (a), 2800.2, subd. (a), 2800.3, subd. (a).) We granted review in this case to address two issues. First, what factors should be considered in determining whether a pursuing peace officer’s motor vehicle is “distinctively marked”? Second, must a trial court on its own initiative define that statutory phrase?
We conclude that a peace officer’s vehicle is distinctively…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.