Legal Opinion

People v. Valladoli

California Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1996No. S045411PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether Penal Code section 969a (all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated) permits the People to amend an information to include prior felony conviction enhancement allegations when (i) the jury has already rendered a verdict for the substantive crimes charged in the information, but (ii) the jury has not yet been discharged. We conclude the amendment, which occurred after the verdict but before sentencing, was permissible under section 969a.

Facts

On October 12, 1993, Officer David Cochrane, working…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BirksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API