Legal Opinion

Powell v. Petch

California Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1913No. S.F. No. 6507PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The plaintiff, I. W. Powell, was a brother of defendant’s decedent. In 1890 the former entered into negotiations to purchase certain real property in the state of Washington and sold to his brother a half interest in said property, taking as part payment of the consideration therefor Robert B. Powell’s note for one thousand five hundred dollars. On December 10, 1892, this note was replaced by another for the principal sum of one thousand five hundred and sixty dollars, the sixty dollars representing interest due on the note of earlier date. Thereafter R. B. Powell paid but one installment of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bullion & Exchange Bank v. HeglerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Fontana Land Co. v. LaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Maurer v. BernardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API