Legal Opinion
Biddel v. Brizzolara
California Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1880No. 7,230PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, in the Superior Court of the County of San Luis Obispo. McMurtry, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. After the decision in Department, the respondent filed his petition that the appeal be reheard in Bank, and the application was denied.
1Opinion of the Court
McKinstry, J.:
The Court below filed the following “ Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
“ 1. That on the 25th day of June, 1874, at the county of San Luis Obispo, the defendant, Bartolo Brizzolara, executed and delivered to the plaintiff his promissory note in writing, whereby, for value received, he promised to pay to the plaintiff one year after the date of said note the sum of §6,000, with interest thereon at the rate of one and one-quarter per cent, per month, from the date of said note until paid, said interest to be *376paid at the end of every three months from the date of said note,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1813
3Cited by31 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.