Maurer v. Bernardo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff J. M. Maurer from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant M. Bernardo in an action upon a promissory note. The facts are not in dispute and are briefly these:
On December 2, 1922, defendant executed and delivered to the assignor of plaintiff a conditional promissory note in the sum of $500. The condition precedent, contained in the note, was performed and the note became due and payable on November 2'6, 1923. The note was not paid. It was assigned to plaintiff and placed in the hands of his attorney, Daniel Bygel, of Oakland, California, for collection. Mr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Searles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Concannon v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Rodgers v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Vassere v. JoergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- CARLTON BROWNE & CO. INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.