Pierce v. Merrill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The guaranty is set out in Pierce v. Merrill, ante, p. 464.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal of defendant Merrill from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Defendants Boucbrake and Howes appealed from the judgment as well as from an order denying a new trial, which appeal was determined in S. F. Ho. 1351, ante, p. 464. In the opinion therein a copy of the guaranty hereinafter referred to is set out.
The action was commenced, as the complaint .shows, on the thirty-first day of January, 1896, to recover on a written guaranty of the payment of a loan of fifty thousand dollars and interest thereon, at the times and according to the terms of a note and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Clunin v. First Federal Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Sherwood v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. Kelley (1937)California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Ohio Electric Car Co. v. Le SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.