Legal Opinion

Fontana Land Co. v. Laughlin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 7633PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

On March 8, 1892, Frederick Wittram, being the owner of certain lands described in the complaint, executed a mortgage thereon to Mary S. Sperry to secure the payment of his promissory note of even date, whereby he promised to pay to the said Mary S. Sperry, one year after the date thereof, the sum of $4,000, with interest payable quarterly in advance at the rate of eight per cent per annum. No part of the principal has at any time been paid, nor has any sum been paid on account of interest except the first quarterly installment, to wit, $80. The period prescribed by the provisions of section…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. ProsserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Scheas v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Neff v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API