Legal Opinion
Bullion & Exchange Bank v. Hegler
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Decided April 18, 1899No. 12,315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On Motion of Defendant for a New Trial.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is an action upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff at Carson City, Fev., on July 24, 1893, for $4,125 each. One of these notes was due and payable one year after date, and the other two years after date. With respect to the first of these notes declared upon, in the complaint it is alleged that afterwards, on the 25th day of October, 1895, the defendant, in and by an instrument in writing signed by him bearing date on that day, and afterwards, .on the 10th day of December, 1896, in and by another instrument in writing signed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Campbell v. HaverhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- McCluny v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- McCormick v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powell v. PetchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Rahilly v. O'LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Nagle v. HeroldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939
- Textile National Bank v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920