Legal Opinion

Fick v. Towers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The appellants in this case, on February 13th, 1923, brought an action in assumpsit, under the Speedy Judgment Act of Baltimore City, against Charles H. Towers and James W. Towers, co-partners trading as Charles H. Towers & Son, and Charles H. Towers and Anna Towers, his wife, and James W. Towers and Ellen Towers, Ms wife, individually. The action was commenced by the filing of a “declaration, notice to the defendants to plead, open account, affidavit under the act of 1886, chapter 184, and an election for jury trial.” After the writ had been renewed from time to time it was finally, on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dumay v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  2. Craig v. WrothCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Baldwin ex rel. Owens v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  4. International Harvester Co. v. NeuhauserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  5. Coulbourn v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. Murray v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  4. O'CONNOR v. MotenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Petite v. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API