Legal Opinion

Murray v. Hurst

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 30, 1932No. [No. 20, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

John Hurst, a resident of Baltimore City, died testate, and letters testamentary were granted by the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore City to his. executors, 3L Bertha Hurst and Benoni Price Hurst.

While the estate was in course of administration, George Henry Murray brought an action at law against the executors in their representative capacity. The suit was begun in the Superior Court of Baltimore City on July 1st, 1931, by the filing of a declaration, and was instituted, as is authorized by statute, in the jurisdiction where the executors were granted letters testamentary. Code, art. 75, sec.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Green v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  2. Bonaparte v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  3. French v. PetersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Abell v. Simon ex rel. SimonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  5. Loney v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harvey v. SlacumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Tasea Investment Corp. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  3. Wagner v. ScurlockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  4. Little v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Wlodarek v. WlodarekCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API