Legal Opinion

Dumay v. Sanchez

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeals from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.

The plaintiffs, the present appellees, sued out an attachment on original process against the defendant Dumay, under the provisions contained in sections 35, 36, 37 and 38, of Art. 9 of the Code; and under which attachment certain personal effects of the defendant were seized by the sheriff. The claim of the plaintiffs consists of three promissory notes; the first dated the 27th of Soy. 1888, and the other two the 30th of Jan. 1889. The attachment was issued on the 3d of April, 1889, and on the next day thereafter the defendant made a general assignment of all his property for the benefit of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baldwin ex rel. Owens v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  2. Howard v. OppenheimerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  3. Barr v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  4. Moreland v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1846
  5. Wallace v. SortorMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Long v. HawkenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  2. Coulbourn v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Tyrrell v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  4. Gross v. Wood Ex Rel. WoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Kennard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API