Legal Opinion
Petite v. Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 31, 1945No. [No. 9, January Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkell, J.
In this case there is a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the bills of exceptions were not signed in due time. As the appeal presents some questions that do not depend upon bills of exceptions, the motion is denied. Lichtenberg v. Joyce, 183 Md. 689, 39 A. 2d 789, 792. The question remains whether the bills of exceptions are properly before this court.
The appeal was taken on March 18, 1944. The record was received in this .court on June 16th, within the prescribed three-months’ period. Code, 1939, Art. 5, Sec. 6. The record was required to be transmitted on or before June 18th.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lichtenberg v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- White Automobile Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- J. S. Ditch & Bros. v. Western National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Blick v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- H. J. McGrath Co. v. WisnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Picking v. Local Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Loch Hill Construction Co. v. FrickeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Slaska v. IdziCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Litsinger v. RossCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.