Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Neuhauser

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1916PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. (Duncan, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order striking out a judgment which the appellant had obtained against the appellee—the motion having been made after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was obtained. The cause of action was a note dated July 8, 1914, given for the price of a threshing, machine, purchased of the appellant by the appellee for which he signed an order dated June 4th, 1914. The appellee ordered the machine “subject to all conditions of agreement and warranty printed on back of this order and made a part hereof,” and agreed that “purchaser will receive same on arrival, will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spitze v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  2. Smith v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  3. Columbia Paper Bag Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  4. Tyrrell v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Sunderland v. Braun Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keiner v. Commerce Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  2. Glen Alden Corp. v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Remsburg v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  4. Katski v. BoehmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  5. Wisner v. ReesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API