Legal Opinion
O'CONNOR v. Moten
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 7, 1986No. 43, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADKINS, Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether a motion raising a preliminary objection under former Md. Rule 323 extended the time for filing a motion to vacate a default judgment. We hold that it did.
Reduced to their bare essentials, the facts may be simply stated. On 23 . August 1982 appellee, Derrick Moten, sued appellant, Jeffrey O’Connor, and Brandywine Riding Stable, Inc., in tort. 1 After several non ests as to O’Connor, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County authorized substituted service on him, pursuant to former Md. Rule 104. An affidavit of service was filed.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Harvey v. SlacumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Keen v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Himes v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Banegura v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Bienkowski v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Curry v. Hillcrest Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Adams v. MalloryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Quartertime Video & Vending Corp. v. HannaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.