Legal Opinion
Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. v. City of Champlin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 7, 1995No. C7-95-1196PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
On appeal from summary judgment and judgment of mandamus compelling eminent domain proceedings, appellant City of Champlin argues that respondent real estate developer lacked standing to sue for inverse condemnation because respondent did not own the land when the taking occurred. We conclude that on the facts of this case, ownership of the land when the taking occurred is not a dispositive factor, and we affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Vern Reynolds Construction, Inc. (Reynolds) purchased parcels of land in 1988 and 1993 as part of a residential development plan in Champlin,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of ChisagoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Metropolitan CouncilCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.