Legal Opinion

Fabio v. Bellomo

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1993No. C6-91-2542PublishedCited by 482 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMUANOVICH, Justice.

This case arises upon the affirmance by the Minnesota Court of Appeals of a dismissal of appellant’s complaint by Ramsey County District Court. We affirm.

Respondent Dr. James Bellomo was the primary care physician for Appellant Delores Fabio from 1977 until he retired in 1986. Fabio alleges that on at least two occasions during this period Dr. Bellomo noticed a lump in her left breast, but told her not to worry about it because it was a “fibrous mass.” These visits occurred once between 1982 and 1984, and on March 10, 1986. Each time Dr. Bellomo allegedly noticed this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Plutshack Ex Rel. Plutshack v. University of Minnesota HospitalsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by482 opinions

  1. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Bahr v. Boise Cascade Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

477 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API