Legal Opinion
DeCook v. Rochester International Airport Joint Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 22, 2012No. A09-0969PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*611ORDER
In 2002 the Rochester International Joint Zoning Board enacted a zoning ordinance that increased the size of a runway safety zone and changed the restrictions within the safety zone to allow fewer types of uses of land within the zone. The safety zone extended over property owned by respondents Leon S. and Judith DeCook.
The DeCooks brought an inverse condemnation action, alleging that the Board’s decision constituted a taking or damaging of private property for public use for which the DeCooks were entitled to compensation. The district court initially granted the Board’s motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Zeman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- City of Minnetonka v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Vermillion State Bank v. State ex rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017