Legal Opinion
C AND R STACY, LLC v. County of Chisago
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 2007No. A06-2302PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
This case involves an access to County State Aid Highway 19 (CSAH 19) from respondents’ land, Outlot A. Respondents sought to construct a gas station with commercial access to CSAH 19. Prior to construction, appellant County of Chisago (the county) barricaded respondents’ commercial access. Respondents filed a claim in district court, alleging that the county had no authority to regulate access to CSAH 19 without a duly enacted enabling ordinance. Respondents further argued that the county’s failure to enact an ordinance resulted in a taking of respondents’ property…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Davis v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-OA1Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Oliver v. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State ex rel. Commissioner of Human Services v. BuchmannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC's Application for a Second DrivewayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.