Legal Opinion
United States v. Fuller
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 16, 1973No. 71-559PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Respondents operated a large-scale “cow-calf” ranch near the confluence of the Big Sandy and Bill Williams Rivers in western Arizona. Their activities were conducted on lands consisting of 1,280 acres that they *489owned in fee simple (fee lands), 12,027 acres leased from the State of Arizona, and 31,461 acres of federal domain held under Taylor Grazing Act permits issued in accordance with § 3 of the Act, 48 Stat. 1270, as amended, 43 U. S. C. § 315b. The Taylor Grazing Act authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to issue permits to livestock owners for grazing their stock on Federal Government…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by197 opinions
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. 564.54 Acres of Monroe and Pike County LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. 320.0 Acres of Land, More or Less in the County of Monroe, State of Florida,and Salvatore R. CicconeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Paul Conti and Conti Corporation (As Owner of F/v Providenza) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Maynard Alves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.