City of Venice v. Lawrence
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for Writ of Mandate to be directed to the Treasurer of the City of Venice. The facts are stated in the opinion of thé court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Original application for a writ of mandate to be directed- to the respondent requiring him, as treasurer of the city of Venice, to sign a certain municipal bond in the sum of five hundred dollars, it being one of forty bonds of like denomination voted by the electors of said city for the purpose of constructing an outfall sewer.
It appears from the petition, all the allegations of which are admitted by a general demurrer interposed thereto, that on January 22,1912, the hoard of trustees of the city of Venice duly adopted a resolution, approved by its president, whereby it determined that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Redlands v. BrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Collins v. DriscollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- City of Oxnard v. BellahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Bither v. ChristensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3Cited by12 opinions
- Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Board of Supervisors v. CothranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Aughenbaugh v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.