Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aughenbaugh v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1983No. Civ. No. 5646PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.

Introduction

The issue in this appeal is whether appellants have stated a cause of action against respondents Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors (Tuolumne) and Groveland Community Services District (Groveland) for refund of water standby charges paid by appellants and other owners of unimproved lots in the Pine Mountain Lake subdivision at Groveland, California. The trial court answered the question in the negative and sustained respondents’ general demurrer to appellants’ complaint without leave to amend.

As we shall explain, the water standby charges were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Louisiana Ex Rel. Hubert v. Mayor and Council of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Hershey v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Watkinson v. VaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. San Diego Cnty. Water Auth. v. Metro. Water Dist. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. San Diego Co. Water v. Metropolitan Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. San Diego County Water etc. v. Metropolitan Water Dist. etc.California Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API