Legal Opinion

City of Oxnard v. Bellah

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1913No. Civ. No. 1237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to the City Clerk of the City of Oxnard. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In mandamus. The alternative writ was issued by this court upon the filing of an affidavit setting forth that the petitioner, a municipal corporation, through its board of trustees, employed certain engineers to assist in making estimates of the cost of a proposed municipal water system for the city; that after consultation with such engineers the board of trustees made an estimate that the cost of such proposed water system would amount to $107,513.76; that thereafter the board, by an ordinance adopted February 6, 1912, determined and declared that the public interest and necessity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. City of Los Angeles v. TeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. City of Santa Barbara v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Jewett v. School District No. 25Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Venice v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. GrimSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API