Legal Opinion

Bither v. Christensen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1905No. 8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Foreclosure of mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment, from which defendants appeal on the judgment-roll alone. The only question presented is the claim of defendants that the action was prematurely brought.

From the findings of the court it appears that on August 8, 1898, plaintiff, defendant Christensen, and one Copsey entered into an agreement by which Christensen agreed to purchase certain lands, situated in Mendocino County, owned by plaintiff and Copsey as tenants in common, being the premises described in the complaint; that in payment to Copsey for his interest therein said defendant should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collins v. DriscollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Paige v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Venice v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. McMurtrey v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API