City of Redlands v. Brook
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the defendant, as Treasurer of the City of Redlands, to sign certain municipal bonds. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an original proceeding in which the plaintiffs pray for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant to sign certain municipal bonds which the plaintiffs propose to issue. The canse has been submitted upon a general demurrer to'the complaint for want of facts. The material facts alleged, and by the demurrer admitted, are that Redlands is a city of the sixth class; that its board of trustees at a regular meeting duly adopted, by a vote of more than two thirds of all its mem bers, a resolution declaring it necessary to incur an indebtedness of fifty thousand dollars for the following…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Board of Education v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3Cited by13 opinions
- San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Rexstrew v. City of Huntington ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Sacramento v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Fairfield v. HutcheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.