Legal Opinion
Huff v. Dyer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided May 12, 2009No. A09A0507PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.
On January 13, 2007, Jamie Huff was injured when a dog owned by Theresa and Michael Dyer bit her. Huff sued the Dyers, claiming that they failed to warn her of their dog’s dangerous propensities and that they committed negligence per se by violating OCGA § 51-2-7 and the Hall County Animal Control Ordinance. Following a jury trial, the jury found in favor of the Dyers. Huff appeals, claiming that the trial court erred in (i) granting the Dyers’ motion for a directed verdict as to their dog’s dangerous propensities and (ii) denying her motion for a directed verdict as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubbard v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Johnston v. WarendhCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Durham v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Atlanta, Inc. v. HolleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Oertel v. Chi Psi FraternityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Steagald v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- S&S TOWING & RECOVERY, LTD v. CHARNOTASupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- Stennette v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Cowan v. CarilloCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Abundant Animal Care, LLC v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.