Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Warendh

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 30, 2001No. A01A1480, A01A1481PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Agneta and Per-Olof Warendh filed suit against Lori Johnston and her brother, Robert Johnston, seeking damages for injuries Agneta Warendh sustained when she was attacked by two Rottweilers outside the home the Johnstons shared with Michelle Berndt. The trial court denied in part the Johnstons’ motions for summary judgment, finding the existence of genuine issues of material fact as to whether the dogs were “confined on the premises” within the meaning of the local ordinance. The court granted their motions for partial summary judgment as to punitive damages and attorney…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Smith v. MerckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. Harvey v. BuchananSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Montgomery v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tyner v. Matta-TroncosoSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Steagald v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Bouve & Mohr, LLC v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. S&S TOWING & RECOVERY, LTD v. CHARNOTASupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  5. Huff v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API