Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Carillo

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2015No. A14A2330PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

After their minor childrenE. G. andY. G. were bitten by a pit bull, Rafaela Carillo and Ernesto Gurrola (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Daniel Cowan and Sarah Arechiga, the owners of the dog.1 The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the Plaintiffs, finding that there was no material question of fact as to whether the dog was properly restrained under OCGA § 51-2-7. A jury then returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs. Cowan and Arechiga appeal, contending that the trial court erred in finding that they were negligent under OCGA § 51-2-7 and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hodge v. SADA Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Sun Nurseries, Inc. v. Lake Erma, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Hamilton v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Evans-Watson v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eshleman v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. S&S TOWING & RECOVERY, LTD v. CHARNOTASupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. MATTA-TRONCOSO Et Al. v. TYNER.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. Efren Cornejo v. Cory AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Eshleman v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API