Legal Opinion

California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1995No. S043694PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

In this case, we address a conflict in the Courts of Appeal on a recurring issue of substantial fiscal significance to California public entities: does interest on a judgment against a local public entity accrue at the postjudgment interest rate of 10 percent per annum prescribed by section 685.010, subdivision (a), of title 9 of part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or at the rate of 7 percent per annum, pursuant to article XV, section 1, of the California Constitution?

We conclude that section 970.1, subdivision (b), of division 3.6 of title 1 of the Government Code, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Manufacturers Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Coleman v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API