Legal Opinion
Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 2006No. B176953PublishedCited by 168 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Defendant and appellant Leatherman Tool Group, Inc. (Leatherman) appeals from the trial court’s summary adjudication of Leatherman’s liability under the false advertising law (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 17500, 17533.7), 1 the unfair competition law (§ 17200 et seq.), and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) as the result of Leatherman’s labeling and advertising its products as “Made in U.S.A.,” when parts of those products were manufactured outside the United States. Leatherman also appeals from the judgment of restitution, the mandatory injunction,…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Wilson v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Gary Davis v. Hsbc Bank Nevada, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.