Legal Opinion

California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1991No. S013951PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Since the addition of the “home rule” provision to our Constitution in 1896, the organic law of California has granted charter cities sovereignty over “municipal affairs.” Although this court and the Court of Appeal have parsed that cryptic phrase in literally scores of cases in the 95 years since the adoption of what is now article XI, section 5, subdivision (a) of the Constitution, what an early member of this court called those “wild words” have defeated efforts at a defining formulation of the content of “municipal affairs.” We granted review in this case to decipher the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lockyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API