Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 1998No. S056373PublishedCited by 174 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
Pursuant to Business and Professions Code sections 5583 and 5584, an architect may be disciplined for wrongful conduct occurring *768after his or her license has been issued.1 In this case we decide whether, pursuant to those sections, an architect may be disciplined for wrongful conduct that occurred prior to the time the architect’s license was issued, when the license itself was not obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. We conclude that the cited statutes also may be applied to wrongful conduct that precedes issuance of the license.
I
Charles Scott Hughes studied…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by174 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Neilson v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.