Legal Opinion

Crux Computer Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 29, 1991No. 90-180CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*224OPINION

SMITH, Chief Judge.

This claim for bid protest costs comes from the contracting officer’s denial of Crux Computer Corporation’s (Crux) claim for the costs of protesting a procurement of a Shuttle Modal Inspection System. These costs were incurred when Crux protested the initial award of a contract to Zonic Corporation (Zonic). Subsequent reevaluation by NASA corrected some of the alleged errors complained of by Crux. Other allegations of error were rejected. However, based upon the reevaluation evidence the contract was still awarded to Zonic. The court finds that NASA’s initial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  3. Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  4. Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Excavation Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  2. Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  5. Hawpe Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API