Crux Computer Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*224OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This claim for bid protest costs comes from the contracting officer’s denial of Crux Computer Corporation’s (Crux) claim for the costs of protesting a procurement of a Shuttle Modal Inspection System. These costs were incurred when Crux protested the initial award of a contract to Zonic Corporation (Zonic). Subsequent reevaluation by NASA corrected some of the alleged errors complained of by Crux. Other allegations of error were rejected. However, based upon the reevaluation evidence the contract was still awarded to Zonic. The court finds that NASA’s initial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Excavation Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cincom Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- United International Investigative Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Sierra Nevada Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Hawpe Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.