Excavation Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
This case comes before the conrt on plaintiff’s exceptions to a recommended decision filed September 28, 1973, by Trial Judge Saul R. Gamer, Chief of the Trial Division, pursuant to Rule 134(h). The court has considered the case on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, plaintiff is not entitled to recover and the petition is dismissed. [See Keco Industries. Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 566, 492 F. 2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Heyer Products Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- E.W. Bliss Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Burroughs Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc. v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and at & T Federal Systems, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Andersen Consulting v. The United States, and Computer Sciences Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.