Legal Opinion
Heyer Products Company v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 1, 1956No. 96-55PublishedCited by 197 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition on the ground that it does not state a cause of action.
The material allegations of the petition are as follows: On March 17, 1952, the Ordnance Tank Automotive Center, Ordnance Corps, United States Army (hereinafter referred to as OTAC) advertised for bids on 5,500 low-voltage circuit testers. On April 15, 1952, plaintiff submitted a bid, together with a sample unit and a letter of explanation, a photograph of the completed unit, a schematic diagram showing the circuit connections, and a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- American Smelting and Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Colorado Pav. Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- United States v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
3Cited by197 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Caci, Inc.-Federal v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Prineville Sawmill Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States and Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
192 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.