Legal Opinion
Analytical & Research Technology, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 8, 1997No. 97-380CPublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This post-award bid protest action is currently before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment upon the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). In its Complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant violated federal statutory and regulatory requirements in evaluating and awarding a contract for computer and network integration and automated data processing operations support services. After a full and careful examination of the administrative record, pleadings, briefs, and other…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Sweats Fashions, Inc. v. Pannill Knitting Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Banknote Corp. of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- PGBA, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.