Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1984No. 8311SC1329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant’s primary assignments of error are that the trial court (1) failed to hold a jury instruction conference, (2) refused to instruct the jury on the charge of possession of a controlled substance as a lesser included offense of sale and delivery, and (3) incorrectly defined constructive possession to the jury. We find the trial court erred in failing to conduct an instruction conference and instructing the jury and submitting a verdict form *57that permitted an inherently ambiguous and fatally defective verdict of guilty of sale or delivery of a controlled substance.

Defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. State v. CoreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API