Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1973No. 32PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the failure of the trial court to require the solicitor to disclose the name of the confidential informer who accompanied Officer Conant to defendant’s home.

“It is the general rule, subject to certain exceptions and limitations . . . that the prosecution is privileged to withhold from an accused disclosure of the identity of an informer.” Annot., 76 A.L.R. 2d 262, 271. “The privilege is founded upon public policy, and seeks to further and protect the public interest in effective law enforcement. It recognizes the obligation of citizens to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Gore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API