State v. Bennett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Justice.
The defendant’s sole question before the Court of Appeals concerned the propriety of the trial court’s unrequested jury instruction regarding the defendant’s failure to testify at trial. The Court of Appeals found that the defendant had not preserved his right of appeal due to his failure to object to the instruction as given as required by Rules of Appellate Procedure [hereinafter “Rules”] 10(b)(2). The Court of Appeals held that Rule 21 of the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts [hereinafter “General Rules”] conflicted with G.S. 15A-1231(b) and,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. OglesbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. StocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. TuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.