Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1983No. 664PA82PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The defendant’s sole question before the Court of Appeals concerned the propriety of the trial court’s unrequested jury instruction regarding the defendant’s failure to testify at trial. The Court of Appeals found that the defendant had not preserved his right of appeal due to his failure to object to the instruction as given as required by Rules of Appellate Procedure [hereinafter “Rules”] 10(b)(2). The Court of Appeals held that Rule 21 of the General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts [hereinafter “General Rules”] conflicted with G.S. 15A-1231(b) and,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. MumfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. OglesbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  3. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. StocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. TuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API