State v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Meyer
The majority opinion, relying on an analysis from State v. Creason, 313 N.C. 122, 326 S.E.2d 24 (1985), holds that a defendant may not be convicted under N.C.G.S. § 90-95(a)(l) for both the sale and the delivery of a controlled substance arising from one transaction. I disagree.
Creason is cited by the majority to support the collapse of what has historically been two separate offenses, sale or delivery, into one offense, the “transfer of a controlled substance by sale or delivery.” Creason involved an exploration of the legislative intent of N.C.G.S. § 90-95(a)(l) focusing on the single…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.