Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1990No. 502PA89Published

1DissentJustice Meyer

The majority opinion, relying on an analysis from State v. Creason, 313 N.C. 122, 326 S.E.2d 24 (1985), holds that a defendant may not be convicted under N.C.G.S. § 90-95(a)(l) for both the sale and the delivery of a controlled substance arising from one transaction. I disagree.

Creason is cited by the majority to support the collapse of what has historically been two separate offenses, sale or delivery, into one offense, the “transfer of a controlled substance by sale or delivery.” Creason involved an exploration of the legislative intent of N.C.G.S. § 90-95(a)(l) focusing on the single…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API