Legal Opinion

State v. Harvey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 12, 1972No. 51PublishedCited by 264 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that the trial judge erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized from defendant’s premises. Defendant first argues that there was no probable cause shown to the magistrate for issuance of the warrant.

The Fourth Amendment requirement that no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the persons or things to be seized, applies to arrest warrants as well as to search warrants. The judicial officer issuing such warrant must be supplied with sufficient information to support an…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by264 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API