Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1990No. 502PA89Published

1Opinion of the Court

395 S.E.2d 124 (1990)

327 N.C. 378

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Lee Hamilton MOORE.

No. 502PA89.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 1990.

Lacy H. Thornburg, Atty. Gen. by Victor H.E. Morgan, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State appellant.

Robin L. Fornes, Greenville, for defendant appellee.

MITCHELL, Justice.

This case calls upon us to determine whether a defendant may be convicted under N.C.G.S. § 90-95(a)(1) for both the sale and the delivery of a controlled substance arising from one transaction. We conclude that a defendant may not be so convicted.

The evidence at trial tended to show…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. HartnessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API