Legal Opinion

In Re Nigohosian

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 11, 1982PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) considered two presentments filed by the local District Ethics Committee and determined that Leon Nigohosian had been guilty of misconduct in two matters involving his clients Stoecker and Tuncay. In addition the Board found various minor violations suggestive of “inadequate record keeping.” The DRB was satisfied that the latter had been remedied by respondent’s hiring of a bookkeeper to oversee his accounts. It likewise concluded that Nigohosian’s entering into a business transaction with a client without sufficient disclosure and without informed consent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. In Re CiprianoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. In Re TurnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. In Re RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. In Re RussellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Matter of HollendonnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Department of Labor v. Titan Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. Matter of TusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API