Legal Opinion

Breidler v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1963No. 7784PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.

This is a petition for certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Commission. In its award petitioner’s compensation was restricted to medical expenses resulting from the lodging of some foreign bodies in his eye and their removal. The commission refused compensation for “Bell’s palsy” which petitioner contracted at the same time and it is of this refusal that petitioner complains. The commission recognized the accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. See, e. g., Watson v. Sam Knight Mining Lease, 78 Ariz. 114, 120, 276 P.2d 536, 539:

“If it is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clifford-Jacobs Forging Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Charlton Bros. Transportation Co. v. GarrettsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Boland v. VanderbiltSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Payne v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Verdugo v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Renteria v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API