Legal Opinion
Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 9, 1978No. 1 CA-IC 1794PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Henry S. STEVENS, Judge,
Retired.
The basic issue before the Court is whether A.R.S. § 23—1061(L), which reads as follows:
“Upon application to the commission, and for good cause shown, the commission may direct that a document filed as a claim for compensation benefits be designated as a petition to reopen, effective as of the original date of filing. In like manner upon application and good cause shown the commission may direct that a document filed as a petition to reopen be designated a claim for compensation benefits, effective as of the original date of filing.”
can be applied by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rodgers v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Breidler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Valiente v. residence/travelersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017