Legal Opinion

Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 9, 1978No. 1 CA-IC 1794PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Henry S. STEVENS, Judge,

Retired.

The basic issue before the Court is whether A.R.S. § 23—1061(L), which reads as follows:

“Upon application to the commission, and for good cause shown, the commission may direct that a document filed as a claim for compensation benefits be designated as a petition to reopen, effective as of the original date of filing. In like manner upon application and good cause shown the commission may direct that a document filed as a petition to reopen be designated a claim for compensation benefits, effective as of the original date of filing.”

can be applied by a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Sun Control Tile Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Breidler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Valiente v. residence/travelersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API