Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1909No. S.F. No. 4962PublishedCited by 84 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Thomas, Pemberton & Thomas, and Weldon & Held, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Elizabeth M. Perkins, one of the plaintiffs who is the wife of the plaintiff J. F. Perkins, was injured by falling into a hole which had been dug by the servants of appellant for the reception of a telephone pole in a street in the city of Ukiah. She and her husband brought suit against the defendant corporation for damages and for the rescission of a certain contract of release which they had made with the Sunset Telephone and Telegraph Company. The judgment was in favor of plaintiffs upon both issues. The agreement was thereby declared void and was ordered canceled upon restoration to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Zaragosa v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API