Payne v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
We granted the petition of Donald Payne to review the opinion and decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the Industrial Commission in denying claimant’s petition to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
Although the Court of Appeals considered multiple issues, we accepted review to consider only one question, and that is whether there was sufficient evidence upon which a prior claim should be reopened pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-1061(H).
The facts necessary for a determination of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Talley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. PolitteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Calixto v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Breidler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re MH 2007-001236Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Perry v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Epstein's Custom Carpentry v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Honeywell, Inc. v. LitchettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.