Legal Opinion

Hackworth v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 7, 2012No. 2 CA-IC 2011-0014PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner employee Gary Hackworth challenges the ruling of the administrative law judge (ALJ) finding his foot injury was not com-pensable. On review, he argues the independent medical examiner’s observation that his injury could have idiopathic causes was an insufficient evidentiary basis for the ALJ to find causation disputed and deny him compensation. We agree and therefore set aside the ALJ’s award.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 On review, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the award,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Lovitch v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Charlton Bros. Transportation Co. v. GarrettsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Helmericks v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Stainless Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management v. Scott WoodworthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Anderson v. All rock/twin CityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Jimenez v. erickson/indemnityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Mahmoodi v. AdotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Martin v. Camp Verde usd/arizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API